<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PGO confirms RCV engine program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://2strokebuzz.com/2008/10/21/pgo-confirms-rcv-engine-program/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://2strokebuzz.com/2008/10/21/pgo-confirms-rcv-engine-program</link>
	<description>And that&#039;s why I don&#039;t like cricket</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:44:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>http://2strokebuzz.com/2008/10/21/pgo-confirms-rcv-engine-program/comment-page-1#comment-6270</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2strokebuzz.com/index.php/?p=4347#comment-6270</guid>
		<description>Direct link to cited Gizmag article:

http://www.gizmag.com/go/5139/

The article from gizmag is from 2 and a half years ago and directly identifies MPI.  I can see how it wouldn&#039;t seem so dramatic of an advantage in power if it&#039;s only 20 percent more powerful than the standard air cooled, two valve four stroke engine of the time.  Since then I think Yamaha or Honda has tossed in another valve on their LC 4T 50cc engines.  I think that they reaped their performance profit in terms of a balance of power and reliability, but one could see the performance gap closing between standard valve 4 stroke 50cc engines and basic two stroke 50cc scooter engines (it&#039;s still not there though!).  I wonder if the RCV advantage has been negated and that&#039;s why there&#039;s no rush to production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Direct link to cited Gizmag article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gizmag.com/go/5139/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gizmag.com/go/5139/</a></p>
<p>The article from gizmag is from 2 and a half years ago and directly identifies MPI.  I can see how it wouldn&#8217;t seem so dramatic of an advantage in power if it&#8217;s only 20 percent more powerful than the standard air cooled, two valve four stroke engine of the time.  Since then I think Yamaha or Honda has tossed in another valve on their LC 4T 50cc engines.  I think that they reaped their performance profit in terms of a balance of power and reliability, but one could see the performance gap closing between standard valve 4 stroke 50cc engines and basic two stroke 50cc scooter engines (it&#8217;s still not there though!).  I wonder if the RCV advantage has been negated and that&#8217;s why there&#8217;s no rush to production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>http://2strokebuzz.com/2008/10/21/pgo-confirms-rcv-engine-program/comment-page-1#comment-6268</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://2strokebuzz.com/index.php/?p=4347#comment-6268</guid>
		<description>The sleeve valve engine is interesting.  Cruise around the USPTO or Google Patents and search for odd valve engine tech.  It dates back a long time and can be fun to look at the diagrams.  But this is not a Wankel rotary engine like the rumors  linked to Genuine previously.  Regardless, super cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sleeve valve engine is interesting.  Cruise around the USPTO or Google Patents and search for odd valve engine tech.  It dates back a long time and can be fun to look at the diagrams.  But this is not a Wankel rotary engine like the rumors  linked to Genuine previously.  Regardless, super cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
